constitutional objection.
We have been brought up against the constitutional objection.ethical objection.
I have no ethical objection to every man serving his country in the best way in which his capacities permit.frivolous objection.
I do not quite know what one would regard as a frivolous objection.fundamental objection.
There is a more fundamental objection to the equilibrium selection approach.legitimate objection.
That seems to me to be a legitimate objection.main objection.
An internal discussion document confirms that its main objection was the double-payment burden.moral objection.
A resident's subjective moral objection may not be borne out in the review process, but the resident is still entitled to hold that moral position.obvious objection.
There is, of course, an obvious objection to the general line of argument that is being developed here.philosophical objection.
There is an important philosophical objection to any attempt to conflate precedential meaning and background justification.principal objection.
The principal objection to the first answer is that it lacks evidential support.principled objection.
From the prioritarian point of view, then, there is no principled objection against attending to the interests of more productive individuals.religious objection.
The borderline between a religious objection and a conscientious objection is narrow, and extremely difficult to define.serious objection.
Parity of esteem and the other maximally egalitarian commitments of the agreement met with no serious objection.specific objection.
I hardly see how this amounts to historical inaccuracy but perhaps this is not the specific objection to which you are referring.strong objection.
I do not think this constitutes a strong objection to my view.theoretical objection.
While this might seem an attractive approach, a major theoretical objection can be raised against such a method.